bcd Bonus BCD community poll

[SatoshiwoIf]

Cast your vote, we need the community to work together to promote the change for everyone's potential benefit.

[OldHead]

nice one

[bestbtcfaucets]

done

good luck

[YassineLmzaiti]

good advss bro

 

[SatoshiwoIf]

3 minutes ago, OldHead said:

nice one

 

1 minute ago, bestbtcfaucets said:

done

good luck

Thanks guys. I hope there is enough community involvement that we can all together help make that change.

[galactika]

its like 5-4 $ per only 1 cent bcd unlock if it is a bonus so make it like a bonus consider at least 5% of wager as bonus reduce giving free bonus and make the wagering it more easier ! no one likes it in this way only high rollers making profit by it and how many % of bc users are high rollers? 

[Wanass]

7 godzin temu bestbtcfaucets powiedział:

gotowy

powodzenia

 

Yeah bcd

[SatoshiwoIf]

   While I want to agree with you, I cannot..

see, its not about whether or not we profit from unlocking BCD, its about there not being a $4,000 wager requirement to use the BCD that has been unlocked, this is why I voted for 0.01 BCD minimum requirement to cash it out to our balances, this allows 2 things, 
 

1.) we could then make use of the unlocked BCD if we find ourselves busted but having just wagered off everything we had available including multiple instance of rakeback, which is only about a 400:1 wager-to-balance ratio.. so, if you had $1 but were able to clear a $400 total wager, you would then have that same $1 in your rakeback, allowing you to restart from square1 and not squarenone.



2.) it would make us more inclined to deposit more often if we knew that there was an availability of even $0.01 if we deposit $1 and wager $4.. which gives us hope for a recovery, no matter ow bleak, as degens, we take the risk anyway, as people we take the risk anyway, because.. what is there to lose vs what is the potential for gain?



BCD is like a bonus rakeback, not necessarily a cashback/lossback but a way of "earning" a bonus amount of funds dependent on what we deposit. it only has an ever-so-slightly higher unlock requirement per dollar as rakeback does.

we are ultimately the ones who determine the fate of our profits or losses, its not up to the casino's anywhere, to ensure that we win and are consistently able to withdraw... it would be called winning, not gambling.

I appreciate your vote and your input though bud.

(PS.
also, I'm far from a high-roller or whale.
i've only learned how to pull off some pretty large wagers with some unorthodox tactics that dont always work)

[Fortuknat]

I agree

[dinhmenh]

Do e

[Lemak]

done¡

[SARHANG]

[EricKnows]

Its fair to be lowered at $2 maybe.  because its a bonus and bonus doesnt need hard requirements otherwise it was already satisfied with the required wager base on percentage amount. 

[dinhmenh]

Wow

[MASI8800]

On 4/6/2022 at 4:37 PM, Satoshimask said:

   While I want to agree with you, I cannot..

see, its not about whether or not we profit from unlocking BCD, its about there not being a $4,000 wager requirement to use the BCD that has been unlocked, this is why I voted for 0.01 BCD minimum requirement to cash it out to our balances, this allows 2 things, 
 

1.) we could then make use of the unlocked BCD if we find ourselves busted but having just wagered off everything we had available including multiple instance of rakeback, which is only about a 400:1 wager-to-balance ratio.. so, if you had $1 but were able to clear a $400 total wager, you would then have that same $1 in your rakeback, allowing you to restart from square1 and not squarenone.



2.) it would make us more inclined to deposit more often if we knew that there was an availability of even $0.01 if we deposit $1 and wager $4.. which gives us hope for a recovery, no matter ow bleak, as degens, we take the risk anyway, as people we take the risk anyway, because.. what is there to lose vs what is the potential for gain?



BCD is like a bonus rakeback, not necessarily a cashback/lossback but a way of "earning" a bonus amount of funds dependent on what we deposit. it only has an ever-so-slightly higher unlock requirement per dollar as rakeback does.

we are ultimately the ones who determine the fate of our profits or losses, its not up to the casino's anywhere, to ensure that we win and are consistently able to withdraw... it would be called winning, not gambling.

I appreciate your vote and your input though bud.

(PS.
also, I'm far from a high-roller or whale.
i've only learned how to pull off some pretty large wagers with some unorthodox tactics that dont always work)

one

[nevermind]

 

[shaynedaile]

love it

[666666666]

برای باز کردن ده دلارقفل شده باید چندین برابر قبل هزینه کنیم و شرط بندی کنیم و زمان بیشتری صرف بازی کنیم

تاده دلار باز کنیم و براحتی در عرض چند دقیقه از دستش میدهیم و دوباره از اول تمام مراحل تکرار میکنیم تا ده دلار بعدی باز کنیم ..

در اصل تمام هزینه و زمان ما صرف باز کردن ده دلار میشه و در آخر هیچ سود و نفعی برای ما نداشته و تنها کسی که ضرر کرده کاربر بوده، پس لااقل bcdقفل از گردونه حذف کنید و یک ارز واقعی در روز به کاربران پاداش داده بشه خیلی بهتر است 

[dinhmenh]

On 4/6/2022 at 7:07 PM, Satoshimask said:

i've

 

On 4/6/2022 at 7:07 PM, Satoshimask said:

Nice

 

[Camz]

Done

[malpha]

nice 

[dinhmenh]

Wow nice BC

On 4/6/2022 at 7:07 PM, Satoshimask said:

   While I want to agree with you, I cannot..

see, its not about whether or not we profit from unlocking BCD, its about there not being a $4,000 wager requirement to use the BCD that has been unlocked, this is why I voted for 0.01 BCD minimum requirement to cash it out to our balances, this allows 2 things, 
 

1.) we could then make use of the unlocked BCD if we find ourselves busted but having just wagered off everything we had available including multiple instance of rakeback, which is only about a 400:1 wager-to-balance ratio.. so, if you had $1 but were able to clear a $400 total wager, you would then have that same $1 in your rakeback, allowing you to restart from square1 and not squarenone.



2.) it would make us more inclined to deposit more often if we knew that there was an availability of even $0.01 if we deposit $1 and wager $4.. which gives us hope for a recovery, no matter ow bleak, as degens, we take the risk anyway, as people we take the risk anyway, because.. what is there to lose vs what is the potential for gain?



BCD is like a bonus rakeback, not necessarily a cashback/lossback but a way of "earning" a bonus amount of funds dependent on what we deposit. it only has an ever-so-slightly higher unlock requirement per dollar as rakeback does.

we are ultimately the ones who determine the fate of our profits or losses, its not up to the casino's anywhere, to ensure that we win and are consistently able to withdraw... it would be called winning, not gambling.

I appreciate your vote and your input though bud.

(PS.
also, I'm far from a high-roller or whale.
i've only learned how to pull off some pretty large wagers with some unorthodox tactics that dont always work)

 

Just now, SmilelDibhn said:

Wow nice BC

Nice day

 

[degenicol3]

I definitely agree with ya! Thank you for creating this thread. That being said, I am hopeful this will have a good implication to the current locked BCD situation. FYI I have had around $1000 locked BCD to date. Just lose hope I can unlock it like one time big time.

[0096920]

I hope our voices will be heard

[basic_thedric]

Personally I love the $10 limit. I unlock mine often and find it a lot more useful than the way it was before where it would slowly trickle into my balance then be wagered before it was ever enough to do anything with. At $10 it is actually useful by the time it is unlocked. That said, would love to be able to claim it in the form of any crypto that is offered in the swap. Would save a step from having to swap it after the claim.